RareMetals.net

Neodymium substitutes: what really replaces Nd (and what just reduces how much you need)

When neodymium (Nd) gets tight or expensive, industry does not swap "Nd for element X" in a clean way. Substitution happens at three levels: system substitution (change the motor design), material substitution (switch magnet families), and intensity reduction (use less rare earth per unit of performance).

Back to Neodymium Overview

Three levels of substitution

1. System substitution

Change the motor or generator design so it does not need NdFeB magnets.

2. Material substitution

Switch to a different magnet family (ferrite, alnico, SmCo) where performance allows.

3. Intensity reduction

Keep NdFeB, but use less rare earth per unit of torque or power (design, processing, and magnet engineering).

1

EV traction motors: the main substitute is not another rare earth - it's another motor topology

NdFeB magnets dominate because permanent-magnet synchronous motors (PMSM, including IPMSM) deliver strong power density and efficiency. But there are credible rare-earth-free alternatives that OEMs already use or actively evaluate.

Induction motors (IM)

  • • No permanent magnets.
  • • Proven in EV applications, especially when performance packaging tradeoffs are acceptable.

Wound-rotor / electrically excited synchronous motors (WRSM or EESM)

  • • No rare-earth magnets, but adds rotor excitation, control, and thermal complexity.
  • • OEM interest has been increasing specifically as a way to reduce rare earth exposure.

Switched reluctance motors (SRM)

  • • Magnet-free and robust.
  • • Often framed as a promising EV alternative, with the tradeoff being noise, torque ripple, and control refinement.

Synchronous reluctance and PM-assisted SynRM

  • • A middle ground: can reduce rare earth content, sometimes using weaker magnets (including ferrites) to assist reluctance torque.
  • • Often discussed alongside IM and SRM as valid alternatives when "no rare earth" becomes a design goal.

Reality check: EV substitution is slow because platforms, validation, and supply chains are sticky. But it is real, and it is one of the main reasons "Nd scarcity" is not a one-way bet.

2

Wind turbines: you substitute Nd by changing the drivetrain architecture

A lot of the neodymium narrative is actually "permanent magnet generator (PMG/PMSG) adoption." If you do not want NdFeB magnets, you move away from PMG designs.

DFIG (doubly-fed induction generator) and geared drivetrains

  • • DFIG is a widely used architecture that does not require rare-earth permanent magnets.
  • • Technical reviews describe DFIG's controllability and operating range advantages, and it remains a core "rare-earth-light" pathway for wind.

The substitution trade

PM generators tend to offer advantages in compactness and lower maintenance, which is why they gained share in some segments. WindEurope explicitly discusses PM generator benefits and market penetration patterns (with offshore being heavily PM in that snapshot).

Substitution studies focused on wind conclude there is meaningful potential to reduce rare earth pressure through turbine technology choices and design strategies.

So in wind, "Nd substitute" often means "use a different generator concept," not "use a different element."

3

Magnet material substitutes: ferrite, alnico, SmCo (but performance and temperature decide)

If you stay with permanent magnets but want less Nd dependence, you can switch magnet families. This is feasible in many consumer and industrial uses, but not always in size-constrained, high-efficiency traction systems.

Ferrite magnets

  • • Cheap, widely available, and used at huge scale.
  • • Main limitation is magnetic energy product: you typically need more volume for the same performance.

Alnico magnets

  • • Good temperature stability in some use cases, but lower energy product than NdFeB.

SmCo magnets

  • • Strong high-temperature stability and corrosion resistance advantages.
  • • Still rare-earth-based and often cost-constrained, but can replace NdFeB where temperature performance dominates.

Practical takeaway: material substitution is most likely where you can tolerate larger magnets, lower flux density, or where high-temperature stability matters more than compactness.

4

"Reduced neodymium" magnets: keep NdFeB, but dilute Nd with La/Ce (and accept tradeoffs)

This is not "substitute neodymium" in a pure sense, but it is one of the most important industrial responses to Nd price pressure: partial substitution of Nd/Pr with abundant light rare earths like cerium (Ce) and lanthanum (La).

The technical literature is clear on the direction:

  • • La/Ce substitution can reduce cost and criticality exposure, but it tends to degrade magnetic properties, requiring compensation strategies.
  • • Studies on Ce-substituted Nd-Fe-B show feasibility, with property deterioration at higher substitution levels being a recurring constraint.

So the real "Nd substitute" inside the magnet chemistry is often "use less Nd per magnet," not "remove Nd entirely."

5

Demand-side substitution outside magnets: lasers and glass do not move the Nd market

Nd:YAG lasers and glass coloring are real uses, but they are not the demand engine. Even if substitutes exist in those niches, they do not change the main Nd story because Nd demand is magnet-driven.

(That's why the rest of this page focuses on motors, generators, and magnet materials.)

What substitution means for the neodymium market

Fastest substitution

Industrial designs where size is not critical (ferrite/alnico), and some motor/generator architecture shifts where OEMs accept redesign costs.

Slowest substitution

High-performance, size-constrained systems where NdFeB enables top-tier power density and efficiency (many EV and robotics designs).

Most likely near-term response

Reduce rare earth intensity per unit output (design optimization, magnet engineering, partial La/Ce substitution) rather than ripping magnets out overnight.